Vibrational Reviews: Barbara Marx Hubbard, native american wisdom, Dr. David Hawkins, Dr. Sun Myung Moon

Barbara Marx Hubbard personal vibration: 400
her theories, her teachings: 300
Does she connect to Source? no.
Is her teaching Tree of Life or Tree of Knowledge? Tree of Knowledge.
Is her teaching actionable and take you to where she says you should go? no
Is there anything useful in what she teaches? yes. Teaching that humanity needs to change something fundamental, that humanity needs to become inner-directed is useful, although not actionable

robert talltree: 200
terri talltree: 160
website vibration: 210
their message: 210
Native american wisdom: 190
why so low? because it considers everything more powerful than the human. The four Agreements book is useful, but incomplete. The knowledge is useful but is very very very far from the Original Design, that is why the numbers are so low.
The people attracted to it are themselves are low vibration and want “cheap closure now” type of solutions to their problems, aren’t interested in growing or transformation.

Dr. David Hawkins: 300
his methodology: 200 (flawed because of the model he uses)
his ideas: 200
truth value: 300

Dr. Sun Myung Moon personal vibration: 200. Mrs Moon: 210
Is he the messiah? no
vibration of his teaching: 200
The “moonies”

2 Replies to “Vibrational Reviews: Barbara Marx Hubbard, native american wisdom, Dr. David Hawkins, Dr. Sun Myung Moon”

    1. Elena, I am an innovator, but that doesn't mean that I base any of "my" methodology on his vibrational scale of consciousness. Besides, you can invent a scale, get famous for it, and it's wrong. The only things I actually accept as valid from Dr. David Hawkins' methodology are

      you can muscle test vibration and truth value
      it's a good way to show the different vibrations, in a logarithmic scale. I did a course with Quantum Thought Shifting Guru, Pam Ragland a few years ago (1977) and to prove that what she did worked, she showed our before and after vibration, with tens of zeros… I (and others in the class) were impressed… but those numbers were meaningless: the distinction she called vibration is not an actual cycle per second number, it is a relative number, much like percentage, between not at all there, and totally there… the there being the highest consciousness available to a human.
      I tend to see evidence that the number 200 correlates quite nicely to being a dividing line between all lower self/some higher self.
      nothing else seems to be what he says (or the other copycat authors) and even he had a source regarding to a scale, the widely hated L. Ron Hubbard. Actually L. Ron Hubbard's scale, who I don't like myself, is a better scale, but is harder to use, because it is not logartithmic, and ends around 400.

      How about this for a long answer? lol
      Sophie (PS: the email with the link to the New Healing Modality report is on the way)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s